Is there a difference between a designer or artist?
Posted: November 22, 2008 at 1.55 pmPosted by in graphic design

GUEST POST BY Aaron Irizarry
Web : www.thisisaaronslife.com
Follow Aaron on Twitter : http://twitter.com/aaroni268
Lets start
This may sound like a silly question to most (*not to me, ED), but to those of us who are artists or designers I imagine we have some strong opinions about this question.
Outside of my daily job and frequent side/freelance work that I take I often (as often as I am allowed the time) paint and take part in or put on art shows. With this said I think there is a distinct difference between art and design.
Lets unpack this idea a bit
Jin Ye (http://www.8164.org/) says
“Art is subjective and self expressive. If we’re making a site for ourselves, then anything goes. You can forget about usability and the normal conventions. When creating sites for clients, or a web app for usage by others we do need to think about others. It’s about a fine balance.”
I have found this to be a true statement to some extent, if I want my site to succeed I will make sure that usability is enough for others to see that I am skilled at my trade (if it is a site that is geared towards showcasing my work and abilities) as I work at my job yes I use certain elements of artistic evaluation, but I for the most part I am delivering a product that needs to meet the needs of others, and the focus is on meeting the project needs not my own artistic abilities.
On the other hand I am able to provide a quality product because I have a creative/artistic eye and ability to create visually appealing products for those who don’t have this ability that is why they hire designers. Jeff Croft draws a very plain distinction that “no they are not the same” in recent presentations.
So I pose the question…
What is your opinion? Designer, Artist are they the same? What do you consider yourself?
Thanks for tuning in…
And to nicely round things off
Thank you for popping by WeAreJustCreative. If you want to contribute to WAJC, write an article, review, submit some work then please do, really it is more the merrier here. Also you can follow my Twitter feed below for more up-to-date information on both IJC and WAJC plus also Subscribe to the FREE news letter, so you can receive new articles as and when they happen.
Graham’s Twitter profile : ImJustCreative
Subscribe to the : Email or RSS feed.
And finally, if you liked this article enough to share, then maybe you can show your appreciation by adding them to any of these Social Bookmarking tags :









20 Comments
November 22, 2008 at 2.33 pm
[...] Another fellow blogger placed an observative post today on Is there a difference between a designer or artist …Here’s a quick excerptSubscribe to Email Updates. Want to be kept abreast of new developments, site updates and the like? Then subscribing will ensure just that. No spam or junk, just pure content as you see it here. Easy to Unsubscribe, no hoops to jump … [...]
November 22, 2008 at 4.09 pm
I think it all depends on who the work is created for
November 22, 2008 at 4.47 pm
[...] Here is a link to my recent article on We Are Just Creative [...]
November 22, 2008 at 7.58 pm
yes. Form vs function innit.
November 24, 2008 at 12.51 am
I think there is a big difference, i’d be interested in hearing more about people who do both. I would like to do both but cannot get into the whole designing for others way of thinking without stifling my creativity.
November 24, 2008 at 3.11 am
Designers and Artists are the same in respect to the fact that both create visual pieces of work for ourselves or others. Technically, everything is “designed” from the ground up; choices are made to create a great looking website, as well as a beautiful painting. Colors, style, emotion, energy, and many other aspects all make up a work piece regardless of what it is.
Maybe we need a new term to describe “designers” and “artists.” I like to sometimes refer to myself as a Creative. :)
November 24, 2008 at 3.42 pm
Thanks for the feedback everyone!
Good discussion is what I had hoped for.
I often find myself in the middle. When I am designing for myself or others I can be bound by the scope of the project having to make sure that it accomplishes the goal/result that the client has expressed.
With art the only thing i am really bound by is a possible message that i am hoping to convey in my piece.
I think that we can achieve great success as creatives (great terminology Lasha) by finding the right time to blur the lines so that we are helping those we design for have great end products that not only look amazing, but meet the needs of the client.
I still hold that designer and artist are not the same, but i do believe someone can be both, and that at times they can cross over into the other.
Thanks for all the comments, and thanks again Graham for the chance to ramble a bit :)
November 26, 2008 at 2.39 am
design = useful, means to an end, practical
art = useless, timeless, poetic
November 26, 2008 at 4.38 pm
@David
Nice equation… I would say though that art isn’t entirely useless, many people are inspired by it, and it can tell a story, define a historical concept, not to mention that the artist is using it as a means of expression.
i do agree that can definitely be timeless and and poetic.
Aaron Irizarry´s last blog post..Feature - Death to the Movies!
December 4, 2008 at 7.19 pm
Aaron, I remember that post by Northern Temple:
http://northtemple.com/2008/10/29/are-designers-artists-if
You may also be interested in reading the comment section of
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/11/25/dont-follow-trends-set-them/
The subjects of “design vs art” and “designer vs artist” are a bit different IMHO. The latter, shares a lot of overlapping especially when it comes to web design. A designer can be an artist, or vice versa.
However, if you actually look at what they produce, there is a difference. Most sites we design for clients can be seen as products, therefore the user experience is not only limited to the visual, but also the intuitiveness of the interaction.
When it comes to this type of debate I’ve read over the years, it seems quite a few people treat it rather dichotomically. You either have form, or function. Therefore form vs function. Why can’t we have both? Why do they have to be separated at the first place? I don’t buy the argument of “budget constraint.” It takes the same amount of money to come up with a good UI as a bad one.
Form is the artistic element in design. A design is soulless without it, no matter how usable it is. That’s why I stressed on “balance.”
Art, as in the elements that trigger an emotional response definitely is a big part of design. But it’s only a subset of design.
I also believe when people get offended when told design is not art, it’s because they’re focusing a bit too much on the labels, instead of substance.
Thank you for quoting me Aaron and bringing up this discussion.
P.S. My last name is Yang not Ye :)
Jin´s last blog post..Victors’ History
December 4, 2008 at 10.15 pm
I would put into the pot that the cultural role of art as a motivation to get people to think outside the box and to think about the world in a different way - remember it was the movies of the past - is key to the difference. Design, in contrast, is about creating something for the purpose of consumption - a chair that should be sat on, a car that must be able to be driven, an advertisement poster that must get the message across rather literally.
While there will always be a crossover between art and design it’s often overlooked that the history of art and design are different, for their own reasons. Art need not necessarily be functional, for example. They are just different.
But it’s a conversation that will continue because designers seem to want to be acclaimed as artists. Why I don’t know. I’m married to an artist and they don’t make a lot of money, less by far than designers. The real problem is that for many people art is about pretty pictures and therefore people who make pretty pictures are artists… but that doesn’t necessarily work.
A visit through art history should start to shed light on the difference between art and design, and why both exist.
December 5, 2008 at 3.17 am
[...] of the big unanswered circular debates out there is the Design versus Art question. Why is it that artists almost never want to be called designers, and yet more than a [...]
December 5, 2008 at 5.01 pm
I don’t consider “designers” equal to “artists”. Nor do I believe “crafters” are “artists”.
However, the methods (process) of creative thinking to take an idea and turn into something; be it hand-thrown pot, jewelry, website, painting etc are similar across disciplines.
Is a composer a musician? The comparisons could go on and on and on with regard to varies disciplines.
Me… I’m both!
December 6, 2008 at 4.20 pm
I think all artists should be designers to create great art, but not all designers are artists.
December 7, 2008 at 8.54 pm
One way to differentiate is the level of craftmanship. I would say that designers create “things” and artists create “expressions” but then you have someone like Charles Rennie Mackintosh whose creations were functional pieces of art. In my opinion, only craftmanship can elevate a designer to the level of “artist.”
October 1, 2009 at 4.10 am
[...] I paint or design for myself… why do I limit myself so much? Part of this can attributed to the differences between art and design, and some of it can be attributed to the scope of a project… or what i think people will say [...]
March 3, 2010 at 5.30 am
DAVIDJMCCLELLAND says:
design = useful, means to an end, practical
art = useless, timeless, poetic
Allow me to refine this math..(from how i see it.)
Design= Rigid,Practical, minor use of self creative input.
Art=Conceptual, Formless(organic), Unpractical and uses a more higher self creativity input.
I suppose both are a form of creative outputs. But personally i feel that Design has more rules restriction due to practicality and the “form an function” routine ,where art, has no rules or boundaries.
March 6, 2010 at 5.27 am
To be quite honest, I never thought of designers and artists to be different entities, as much as I saw design to be a subgenre of art. It’s true that design is much more practical and cold than art is, but it’d be impossible to be a designer without having creativity and vision. And aren’t those two things what make an artist? Just because it’s minimal, doesn’t mean it’s not art.
July 23, 2010 at 4.43 am
Anyone who creates should not seek a “definition” or definite label. To define is to limit and a creator should have no limits
June 8, 2011 at 6.36 am
The Sydney Opera House is a design turned into a piece of artwork. An interior space in the opera house can create an emotional response.is this art if it evokes an emotion?i think a design can become a piece of art, and a piece of art can be a design for something else.The two lean on each other.